Edwards Lifesciences - a world leader in advanced cardiovascular technologies
AP News home
Issue: June 2010
Visits this month: 817
for today's Anaesthesia Professional
June 2010 Articles:

Obstetric Anaesthesia Matters
Author: Dr Neville Robinson FRCA, Consultant Anaesthetist, Northwick Park Hospital, Harrow, Middlesex, HA1 3UJ.


Ultrasound: An Aid To Central Neuraxial Blocks In Obstetrics
Author: Dr SN Naresh FRCA, Specialist Registrar, University Hospital Coventry and Warwickshire, Coventry, CV6 3LL


Labour Pain And Analgesic Options
Author: Dr Ashok Nair, FRCA, Specialty Registrar, UHL, South East School of Anaesthesia



Obstetric Anaesthesia Matters
Author: Dr Neville Robinson FRCA, Consultant Anaesthetist, Northwick Park Hospital, Harrow, Middlesex, HA1 3UJ.

Obstetric anaesthesia and analgesia is always full of interest and challenge. As medically sicker patients are becoming pregnant newer challenges have arisen. Some of these are discussed in the following article.


Pre-operative assessment

Early identification and planning of obstetric care by multidisciplinary teams was emphasised in the last CEMACH report 1. To this end all maternity units should now have obstetric anaesthetic antenatal clinics dealing with relevant anaesthetic problems, and obstetric or medical illnesses that need anaesthetic input. The problems of the obese patient from both a regional and a general anaesthetic point of view need special consideration. Anaesthetists are suggested to review patients who are morbidly obese (BMI > 35). Apart from predicting problems these clinics allow planning for more complicated parturient management. All elective caesarean section patients should now be seen in pre-assessment clinics by anaesthetists.


Classification of caesarean section

The degree of urgency of caesarean section has long been a source of tribulation between obstetricians and anaesthetists. Communication about the need of immediacy of caesarean section by obstetricians has often been subjective with a variety of results. The terms ‘crash section,’ emergency, semi-emergency, semi-elective and elective were used but meant different things to different members of the team. A ‘30 minute’ rule was used for emergency surgery but this is also subjective in terms of the potential emergency nature of the surgery. NICE guidelines and the Royal Colleges of both Obstetricians and Anaesthetists now recommend that classification 2 be carried out on every case according to the following schedule:

Category 1: immediate threat to the life of the mother or fetus

Category 2: maternal or fetal compromise which is not immediately life threatening

Category 3: needing early delivery but no maternal or fetal compromise

Category 4: at a time to suit the woman and maternity team.


Equipment and staffing

Epidural equipment is standardised in the main with 16 or 18 gauge needles being in common practice. Newer refinements may occur soon with smaller and stronger epidural needles being manufactured. Newer advances in catheter material may allow for smaller atraumatic catheters to be manufactured. Safer loss of resistance devices which allow for two handed advancement of the needle and thus a potentially lower dural puncture rate have also been developed and the Epidrum® is one such example. This device has a small one ml priming pump attached to it which collapses once the epidural space is located.

Newer equipment that is often deemed necessary in the delivery suite include a thromboelastograph for instantaneous clotting profiles, haemoglobin measurement from oximetry, oesophageal Doppler cardiac output monitoring, a Level 1 tranfusor device to assist in major haemorrhage and major patient transfer equipment for the transfer of the critically ill patient to the Intensive Care Unit.

Maternity High Dependency Units of a Level 2 standard are now becoming an integral part of maternity units. Staffing of these areas is traditionally done by midwives. There are now several units with trained High Dependency Unit nurses assisting in the care of the ill parturient. Medical care can be delivered by these experienced staff and maternity care by midwives. More midwives are now trained in managing and understanding the sick mother.


Nerve injuries after neuraxial anaesthesia

Anaesthetists are often aware of obstetric palsies as regional anaesthesia is often blamed for them. However, the most common palsies are intrinsic and have a reported incidence of 0.6 to 92 per 10,000 deliveries. Stretch or compression injury to the lumbosacral plexus or lower extremity peripheral nerves in childhood is blamed for them but compression of the nerve vascular supply mechanism is another possibility. Nullparity, a prolonged second stage of labour, cephalo-pelvic disproportion, non-vertex presentation and forceps deliveries are associated with palsies. The most common is a lateral femoral neuropathy known as meralgia paresthetica. The nerve arises from the lateral border of the psoas muscle medial to the anterior superior iliac spine and then passes under or through the inguinal ligament and is vulnerable to compression. It is sensory to the lateral thigh and is also easily injured in caesarean section. Other nerves likely to be injured in childbirth include the femoral, obturator, sciatic and the common peroneal nerves 3.

Anaesthetic related nerve damage does exist but is rare. Estimates in obstetric anaesthesia range from 1.2 – 0.3 per 100,000 procedures. Damage caused can include spinal haematoma, epidural abscess, traumatic spinal cord injury (from the needle), intracranial subdural haematoma, abducens nerve palsy and the development of Horner’s syndrome. Direct spinal cord trauma is most worrying as it can lead to permanent spinal cord injury and is most likely to arise from spinal or combined spinal epidural anaesthesia. Recommendations for minimising this complication include choosing a lumbar puncture site below L3, halting needle advancement if the patient perceives pain or paraesthesia and injecting anaesthetic solutions only if all pain and paraesthesia has disappeared 4.


Magnesium

Magnesium is a critical physiological cation and its deficiency in pregnant women may contribute to the development of pre-eclampsia, impaired neonatal development and to metabolic problems extending into adult life. Neurologically the inhibition of calcium channels and antagonism of the NMDA receptor raises the potential of neuronal protection and magnesium administration to prematurely labouring mothers may reduce the incidence of neonatal cerebral palsy. In the management of eclampsia magnesium has been shown to terminate convulsions and prevent further convulsions. It is also the agent of choice for the prevention of convulsions but the argument as to which pre-eclamptic mother should receive magnesium is unresolved. Magnesium therapy has potential complications in its own right and it is usually received for patients with severe disease 5.


Effects of labour analgesia on the foetus

Labour pain and stress are associated with a progressive foetal acidosis. In terms of analgesia nitrous oxide relieves labour pain more effectively than pethidine and it is worth noting that if Entonox is found to be ineffective it is useless to offer pethidine. Pethidine is not recommended but is available for labour analgesia. It causes neonatal respiratory depression which is most severe if pethidine is given 3-5 hours prior to delivery but the depression is only slight if pethidine is given within an hour of delivery. Epidural analgesia in labour, whilst it has some short-term maternal side effects, when compared to systemic analgesia is shown to be consistently beneficial in terms of not only Apgar score but also of acid-base status and is less likely to impair breast feeding. Epidural analgesia is associated with maternal pyrexia but this does not appear to be of any consequence to the neonate because if it were there would be an increased incidence of fetal acidosis after epidural analgesia in labour whereas in reality the reverse is true 6.

Coagulation in pregnancy

Pregnancy is associated with physiological changes that include an increase in the majority of clotting factors and a decrease in natural anticoagulants and a reduction in fibrinolytic activity. The mother becomes hypercoagulable and risks thromboembolism. The changes reverse to normal about 4 weeks post-partum. Pregnancy can induce changes in platelet numbers and function which can complicate the provision of regional analgesia and anaesthesia. Most practitioners will perform regional anaesthesia if the platelet count is above 80 x 109/l if the trend of platelet function is stable 7. The use of low dose heparin is becoming more common and often decisions about the provision of regional anaesthesia are difficult. Normally the following rules are utilised:

  • Regional anaesthesia should be avoided for 12 hours after a prophylactic dose of LMWH (6 hours after a dose of unfractionated heparin)
  • Regional anaesthesia should be avoided for 24 hours after a therapeutic dose of LMWH
  • LMWH can be given 2 hours after the placement of a regional block or removal of an epidural catheter. However, many units choose 6 hours to minimise the risk of post-operative haemorrhage.
  • Risk/benefit analysis needs to be undertaken in most cases.

Pharmacogenetics

Pharmacogenetics is the study of the variability in drug response due to genetic variability. The first observation of this influence was made in the 1950s when the genetic influence of the metabolism of suxamethonium was noted. It has been highlighted recently because of the variability of vasopressor requirement during spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section seems to have a genetically affected response distribution. This response is clearly affected by the ß2AR genotype and it has been noted that women who are Gly16 homozygous and those who are heterozygous or homozygous for the Glu27 variant require significantly less vasopressors (ephedrine) for the treatment of hypotension during spinal anaesthesia. These 2 haploids appear to ‘protect’ women from requiring higher doses of vasopressors and these haploids are more likely to occur in Caucasian patients. These differences in the population may explain why a simple recipe approach to treating hypotension after regional anaesthesia is unsuccessful. Genetic differences may also explain why some ethnic groups respond better or are more resistant to blood pressure control in pre-eclampsia 8.

Analgesic drugs, especially, codeine are also of significance in this sphere. Codeine is metabolised the cytochrome P450 enzymes. The gene coding for this enzyme is polymorphic and there are more than 75 different CYP2D6 alleles which results in a hugely variable enzyme activity which can range from 1 to 200%. The action of codeine varies from each individual. Poor metabolisers do not achieve analgesia whilst they encounter the side effects such as nausea and vomiting. Conversely codeine intoxication can be anticipated with ultra-rapid CYP2D6 metabolism. There is anxiety about codeine being used in breast feeding mothers. A recent FDA warning followed the death of a breast fed 13 day old neonate was issued because the neonate was thought to have died from a morphine overdose as the mother was taking codeine and was a CYP2D6 metaboliser 9.


Haemorrhage

World wide haemorrhage is the biggest cause of maternal death. It is variably defined and loss is always difficult to assess. In England and Wales the Health Care Commission defined ‘significant’ haemorrhage as > 1000 ml and ‘major’ loss as > 2500 ml. The Scottish Confidential Audit of Severe Maternal Morbidity (SCASMM) considered major haemorrhage as a loss of > 2500 ml or a transfusion of 5 or more units or treatment for coagulopathy. It is stating the obvious but obstetric haemorrhage is notoriously difficult to estimate and is normally under-estimated. Recent thinking in the treatment of major haemorrhage of relevance to anaesthetists is to increase the ratio of clotting factors to packed cells to a ratio of 1:2 or even 1:1 to prevent the onset of coagulopathy. Attempts should be made to avoid further precipitant factors which increase disseminated intravascular coagulation such as shock, acidosis and hypothermia. Adjuncts to treatment with surgery and drugs include the use of cell salvage. A cell saver cuts down on donor blood usage and is cost effective but it must be emphasised that salvaged blood has no coagulation factors. Concerns about amniotic fluid embolism and rhesus immunisation problems have been unfounded. Interventional radiology services are now nationally recommended to be available for the use in the management of placenta accrete and praevia and the use of such facilities has proven to be life saving 10.


References

  1. Lewis G. The confidential enquiry into maternal and child health (CEMACH). Saving mothers’ lives: reviewing maternal deaths to make motherhood safer – 2003-5. The 7th report on confidential enquiries into maternal deaths in the United Kingdom. London. CEMACH. London: HMSO, 2007.
  2. Lucas DN, Yentis SM, Kinsella SM, Holdcroft A, May AE, Wee M, Robinson PN. Urgency of caesarean section: a new classification. Journal of the royal society of Medicine 2000; 93: 346-50.
  3. Wong CA. Neurologic deficits and labor analgesia. Regional Anaesthesia and Pain Medicine 2004; 29: 341-51.
  4. Reynolds F. Neurologic complications of pregnancy and regional anesthesia. In: Chesnut DH, Polley LS, Tsen LC, Wong CA (editors). Obstetric Anesthesia: Principles and Practice. 4th edition, pp701-26. Philadephia: Elsevier Mosby, 2009.
  5. Euser AG, Cipolla MJ. Magnesium sulfate for the treatment of eclampsia. Stroke 2009; 40: 1169-75.
  6. Wilson MJA, MacArthur C, Shennan A. The effect of epidural analgesia on breast feeding: analysis of a randomized controlled trial. International Journal of Obstetric Anaesthesia 2009; 18: S7.
  7. Burrows RF. Platelet disorders in pregnancy. Current Opinion in Obstetrics and Gynaecology 2001; 13: 115-9.
  8. Smiley RM, Blouin JL, Negron M, Landau R‚ 2-adrenoceptor geno type affects vasopressor requirements during spinal anesthesia for caesarean delivery. Anesthesiology 2006; 104: 644-50.
  9. Koren G, Cairns J, Chitayat D, Gaedigk A, Leeder SJ. Pharmacogenetics of morphine poisoning in a breastfed neonate of a codeine-prescribed mother. Lancet 2006; 368: 704.
  10. Shrivastava V, Nageotte M, Major C. Case-control comparison of caesarean hysterectomy with and without prophylactic placement of intravascular balloon catheters for placenta accrete. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 2007; 197; 402e1- 402e5.

top next

If you are interested in responding to one of the articles featured in
Anaesthesia Product News please email us at editor@apnews.co.uk
Ultrasound: An Aid To Central Neuraxial Blocks In Obstetrics
Author: Dr SN Naresh FRCA, Specialist Registrar, University Hospital Coventry and Warwickshire, Coventry, CV6 3LL

Pregnancy brings about a change in the anatomy and physiology dictating the way anaesthesia is delivered, be it either general or regional anaesthesia with the latter having some direct influences on the delivery of pain relief in labour and anaesthesia for operative surgeries.

Currently the gold standard of practice for anaesthesia is regional anaesthesia, either in the form of a subarachnoid block or an epidural for pain control. Failures and complications of regional anaesthesia can be due to many causes, the most important being the blind nature of performing such techniques. The practice of epidurals and spinals relies primarily on the palpation of anatomic landmarks that are not always easy to find. The past few years have seen the introduction of ultrasound to facilitate lumbar spinals and epidurals. The use of pre-procedure or ‘scout’ ultrasound imaging or real-time ultrasound guidance should improve not only clinical practice and safety, but also teaching.

This article aims to describes the techniques and benefits related to the use of ultrasound in guiding lumbar spinals and epidurals

Ultrasound

Ultrasound (US) is simply sound waves, like audible sounds. Although some physical properties are dependent on the frequency, the basic principles are the same. Sound consists of waves of compression and decompression of the transmitting medium (e.g. air or water), travelling at a fixed velocity. Sound is an example of a longitudinal wave oscillating back and forth in the direction the sound wave travels, thus consisting of successive zones of compression and rarefaction. Transverse waves are oscillations in the transverse direction of the propagation.


An Ultrasound Machine

A basic ultrasound machine among various parts for functioning has the following key components.

  • Transducer probe - probe that sends and receives the sound waves
  • Central processing unit (CPU) - computer that does all of the calculations and contains the electrical power supplies for itself and the transducer probe
  • Transducer pulse controls - changes the amplitude, frequency and duration of the pulses emitted from the transducer probe
  • Display - displays the image from the ultrasound data processed by the CPU
The transducer probe is the main part of the ultrasound machine. The transducer probe makes the sound waves and receives the echoes. It is, so to speak, the mouth and ears of the ultrasound machine. The transducer probe generates and receives sound waves using a principle called the piezoelectric effect. When an electric current is applied to these crystals, they change shape rapidly. The rapid shape changes, or vibrations, of the crystals produce sound waves that travel outward. Conversely, when sound or pressure waves hit the crystals, they emit electrical currents. Therefore, the same crystals can be used to send and receive sound waves. The probe also has a sound absorbing substance to eliminate back reflections from the probe itself, and an acoustic lens to help focus the emitted sound waves.

Transducer probes come in many shapes and sizes. The shape of the probe determines its field of view, and the frequency of emitted sound waves determines how deep the sound waves penetrate and the resolution of the image. Transducer probes may contain one or more crystal elements; in multiple-element probes, each crystal has its own circuit. Multiple-element probes have the advantage that the ultrasound beam can be “steered” by changing the timing in which each element gets pulsed; steering the beam is especially important for cardiac ultrasound.


History

The first people to report on the use of US were Bogin & Stulin, for lumbar puncture in the Russian literature in 19711. Then a group of Anaesthesiologists from Arizona, Cork and co-workers used the US to locate the neuraxial anatomy2. Between 2001 and 2004 Grau and co-workers from Germany have done enormous work to evaluate the use of US for epidural punctures3,4.


Imaging of spine: Basic considerations

The various structures of the spine are located at a depth that requires low-frequency US (5-2 MHz). The neuraxial structures also need curved array transducers of US imaging. Low frequency probes provide good penetration but at the expense of resolution, however high frequency probes can be used, but lacks penetration. The low frequency probe would be more appropriate for neuraxial structures as it penetrates deeper.


Spinal sono-anatomy

The key to understand and comprehend the sono-anatomy information being produced by the US is a thorough knowledge of the spine anatomy. The US of the spine can be performed using two acoustic windows. One is the midline transverse (axial scan)5,6, or the longitudinal (sagittal) axis7. The longitudinal scan can be performed either midline or para-median. Both the acoustic windows complement each other and are very useful for central neuraxial blocks. The longitudinal scan helps is the identification of the sacrum, the articular processes, ligamentum flavum and dura mater(Figure 1).
Figure 1. Transverse and Longitudinal views of the lumbar spine
Similarly the transverse scan helps in visualising the articular process, the spinous process, the transverse process, ligamentum flavum, the dura mater and the vertebral body. These structures described above represent the normal findings wit the US. However in the obese, in patients with abnormal spine like scoliosis or kyphosis and in the parturients, the use of US has a major benefit.


Lumbar spine imaging

The lumbar spine can be imaged either by the transverse or longitudinal scans as mentioned above. In the transverse scan the US transducer is placed transverse to the spine with patient in lying or sitting position. The spinous process is then visualised as a hyperechoeic reflection. This scan is useful to identify the midline. However because it blocks the structure below it may not be useful to see the neuraxial structures. In which case if the transducer is moved cranially or caudally, it is possible to see the deeper structures like the ligamentum flavum, the posterior dura, thecal sac and anterior dura8. For the longitudinal scan, the transducer is placed vertically either in the midline or para-median, perpendicular to the long axis of the spine. The images seen are hyperechoeic saw like pattern which represents the articular processes and the interspaces. These spaces consist of the ligamentum flavum, posterior dura and deeper, the anterior dura. Thus the two scans help in complementing each other to define the level, midline, depth and ideal insertion point.

Conclusion

The advent of USG has added to our armoury of equipment, a tool to safely visualise the neuraxial structures and aid in the placement of central neuraxial blocks. It has also been demonstrated to increase accuracy, forecasting difficult epidurals and reducing patient discomfort. It is a safe, non-invasive, validated, radiation free tool with a sharp learning curve and very effective in obstetrics, where the traditional method of assessing the intervertebral spaces by palpation has not proved to be reliable.

References

  1. BoginIN, StulinID: (Application of the method of 2-dimensional echospondylography for determining the landmarks in lumbar punctures.) Zh Nevropatol psikhiatr Im SS Korsakova 71:1810-1811, 1971
  2. Cork RC, Krycc JJ, Vaughn RW: Ultrasonic localization of the lumbar epidural space. Anesthesiology 52:513-16, 1980
  3. Grau T, Leipold RW, Horter J, et al: Paramedian access to the epidural space: The optimum window for ultrasound imaging. J Clin Anesth 13:213-17, 2001
  4. Grau T, Leipold RW, Conradi R et al: Ultrasound control for presumed difficult epidural puncture. Acta Anaesthesiol Scan 45:766-71, 2001
  5. ArzolaC, Davies S, Rofaeel A, et al: Ultrasound using the transverse approach to the lumbar spine provides reliable ultrasound landmarks for labor epidurals. Anesth Analg 104:1188-92. 2007
  6. Carvalho JC: Ultrasound facilitated epidurals and spinals in obstetrics. Anesthsiol Clin 26:145-58, 2008
  7. Grau T, Leipold RW, Conradi R et al: Ultrasound imaging facilitates localization of the epidural space during combined spinal and epidural anesthesia. Reg Anesth Pain Med 26:64-67, 2001
  8. Karmarkar MK: Ultrasound for central neuraxial blocks. Tech Reg Anesth Pain mgt13:161-70, 2009

top next

If you are interested in responding to one of the articles featured in
Anaesthesia Product News please email us at editor@apnews.co.uk
Labour Pain And Analgesic Options
Author: Dr Ashok Nair, FRCA, Specialty Registrar, UHL, South East School of Anaesthesia

Labour pain is considered amongst the most intense physical pain suffered by humans. Over the years attempts have been made to alleviate or at least minimise the pain suffered during labour. Anaesthetists have a direct role in managing labour analgesia and occasionally converting some of the analgesic techniques to anaesthetic options at short notice. The situation has also been made more challenging for the obstetric anaesthetist as patient expectations have raised substantially.

An ideal labour analgesic would:
  • Have complete and predictable analgesic effect
  • No motor impairment during labour
  • No effect on physiological parameters including cardiovascular and respiratory parameters
  • No effect on the progression of labour
  • Safe for the foetus
  • Minimally invasive
  • No potential for inherent adverse effects
    (eg technique related/anaphylaxis etc)
Unfortunately none of the techniques in use fulfil all the above criteria. The commonly used strategies include:

Prepared childbirth
It has been suggested that psychological preparation and education of labour and its associated stages would serve to minimise maternal apprehensions and increase maternal satisfaction. This may also translate to improved tolerance of labour pain via the mechanisms of so called ‘psychoprophylaxis’ 1,2. Further in this era of open communication, it does make sense to take advantage of antenatal meetings to discuss the process of labour and available analgesic options. This gives an opportunity to the mother to understand what to expect and also compare the analgesic options available to her in a reasonably calm environment. This also serves as an intervention associated with no risk and little cost.

TENS
Low intensity, high frequency TENS has been proposed as an analgesic modality for labour pain. TENS has been used for labour pain since the 1970s 3. The precise mechanism whereby TENS relieves pain is not known and a number of mechanisms have been suggested including gate theory 4, complementing the endogenous chemical process 5, increase sense of well being 6,7,8 and decreasing maternal anxiety 9. A recent review by Cochrane 10 which analysed 19 studies involving 1671 patients concluded that there was little difference in pain ratings between TENS and control groups. Where TENS was used as an adjunct to epidural analgesia or CSE 11 there was no evidence that it further improved the quality or duration of labour analgesia. Thus it concluded that there was only limited evidence that TENS reduces pain in labour and it does not seem to have any impact (either positive or negative) on other outcomes for mothers or babies. However it also acknowledged that many women who had used TENS are more likely to use it again in future labour and hence women should have a choice if they think using TENS will be helpful 10.

Acupuncture
A study in Sweden (RCT) which included 46 labouring women who were randomised to receive acupuncture as a compliment or alternative to conventional analgesia reported significantly better degree of relaxation and reduced need for epidural analgesia compared with control group 19. A recent metanalysis 20 included two RCTs which compared acupuncture with conventional care and one RCT which compared manual acupuncture with placebo acupuncture concluded that evidence for acupuncture in managing pain in labour is encouraging and it helps reduce conventional analgesic requirements. Further there were no adverse effects on mother, duration of labour or neonatal outcome with the use of acupuncture. This certainly suggests that acupuncture may be promising analgesic modality in future and more comprehensive research needs to be conducted in its use for labour pain.

Inhalational analgesia
Inhalational labour analgesia involves inhalation of sub anaesthetic concentrations of agents with the mother remaining awake and her protective airway reflexes intact. A variety of agents have been used including ether (Simpson) and chloroform (Snow). Trichloroethylene, cyclopropane and methoxyflurane have all been used in the past by midwives for providing labour analgesia. The currently used options include entonox (nitrous oxide/ oxygen mixture), isoflurane and sevoflurane.

Nitrous oxide
Nitrous oxide was first used for labour analgesia by Stanislav Klikovich in 1881. It is commonly used as entonox (fifty percent mixture with oxygen premixed in a single cylinder) in the UK. The other options available are Nitronox (separate cylinders with a blender) and Midogas (variable concentration within a narrow range). The advantage of nitrous oxide over former agents include ease of administration, lack of flammability, non pungent character, cardiovascular stability, little effect on uterine contractility and lack of malignant hyperthermia trigger. Use of nitrous oxide is very variable with a usage rate of 50 to 75% in the UK to less than 5 % in the USA.

The suggested mechanism of action of nitrous oxide as an analgesic includes release of endogenous opiods in the periaqueductal gray area of midbrain which stimulates descending noradrenergic neuronal pathways 12. There may also be additional effects via dopaminergic pathways in the CNS 12 and NMDA receptor blockade 13. The self administration of entonox can be either via the intermittent technique or continuous technique (less common due to associated higher incidence of drowsiness and nausea/ vomiting). When advising the intermittent technique, it must be acknowledged that there is a time lag of approximately 50 seconds between onset of administration and peak analgesic effect. Further pain is felt approximately 15 seconds after the onset of contraction.

Thus patient education and correct technique is vitally important for the use of entonox as a labour analgesic 18. A recent systematic review 14 which included 11 randomised control trials to determine efficacy concluded that there is no objective and quantitative evidence of analgesic efficacy of nitrous oxide for relief of labour pain. Another study in Finland 16 which included 210 patients concluded that pain levels increased with progression of labour in patients who used entonox as a labour analgesic. It further concluded that there was no benefit in the visual analogue pain scores for patients who received entonox although 72% patients reported moderate to good pain relief. It is suggested that patients using entonox may feel better without substantial reduction in pain.

In a study for UK medical research council 14 there were no significant differences between the APGAR scores or neonatal survival rates to mothers who received nitrous oxide. Another study 15 found no difference in neurologic and adaptive capacity scores for full term newborns of women who received nitrous oxide for labour analgesia. Nitrous oxide though not a potent analgesic, has been used well over a century for labour analgesia without any overt harm to either the mother or newborn. It is also cheap, requires relatively simple equipment and does not need specialist anaesthetic input on a routine basis. However its efficacy as a sole effective labour analgesic is questionable.

Isoflurane, Sevoflurane and Desflurane
These have all been used in subanaesthetic doses as an inhalational analgesic agent. Studies have claimed that isoflurane (0.25%)/ entonox mixture has yielded significantly higher linear analogue pain relief scores than entonox during the first stage of labour without any adverse maternal or neonatal outcome 21. Another randomised double cross over trial which compared sevoflurane (0.8%) with entonox showed a significant reduction in pain intensity with sevoflurane without any adverse effect on uterine tone or total blood loss and neonatal outcome 21. Desflurane (1-4.5%) has been also used without any increased maternal or foetal complication, although there was no convincing evidence of analgesic superiority over entonox 23.

Parentral opiod based analgesia
Several opiods have been used for labour analgesia including pethidine, morphine, diamorphine, meptazinol, fentanyl, alfentanil and remifentanil. Parentral opiods are widely used for labour analgesia because they are cheap, simple and readily available. However it is common knowledge that Opiods also cause a host of undesirable effects including nausea and vomiting, delayed gastric emptying with reduced gastro-oesophageal tone, drowsiness and risk of maternal desaturation and a high degree of placental transfer with associated neonatal effects including increased risk of acidosis at birth 25. A recent survey of consultant led obstetric units in the UK revealed that pethidine continues to be the most widely used opiod (84%) in use for labour analgesia though diamorphine is being increasingly used (34%) with lower rates of usage for morphine and meptazinol 24.

A recent meta analysis by centre for reviews and dissemination which included 48 RCTs involving a total of 9800 women concluded that there was no difference between equipotent doses of various opiods used for labour analgesia 26. There has been increasing questions on the efficacy of pethidine as a labour analgesic with some authorities claiming that it has little analgesic value 27,28 and acts as a primary sedative. A recent double blinded randomised control trial showed that IM pethidine is more effective than placebo but the analgesic effect of pethidine could be described as only modest 29.

There has also been interest in the use of short acting potent opiods (Fentanyl, Alfentanil and Remifentanil) for labour pain. Studies have suggested that fentanyl can be used for labour analgesia to good effect but with extra caution with regards to potential for maternal desaturation and possible foetal outcomes 30. One study which compared Fentanyl and Alfentanil PCA s (in equipotent doses) in labour found Fentanyl to be a more effective analgesic option in the late first stage of labour 31. Remifenatnil is a potent and ultra short acting drug with a context sensitive half life of 3 minutes. It rapidly crosses the placenta and is quickly metabolised in the foetus. There have been contradictory reports on the efficacy and safety of remifentanil for labour analgesia and the studies so far have not proven conclusively that remifentanil could be routinely used as a safe and effective labour analgesic 32-35.

Epidural analgesia
This involves siting a catheter in the epidural space and instilling local anaesthetic either intermittently or continuously to provide labour analgesia. When performed correctly, an epidural should give significant pain relief with little motor block and no sedation. Further there is evidence that it helps reduce maternal sympathetic over activity and hyperventilation when compared to other techniques. It can also be used effectively as a therapeutic option for several primary obstetric indications including augmentation of labour, preeclampsia, trial of scar, multiple pregnancies and also has the potential for conversion to an anaesthetic for caesarean section at short notice. This is particularly relevant in conditions where a general anaesthetic may be inherently risky (eg high BMI, airway abnormalities, co existing respiratory disease, etc).

All these qualities give epidural the status of “gold standard” for labour analgesia. However it is more invasive than the other methods in use and thus has an associated set of serious but rare complications (Hypotension, parasthesia on insertion, post dural puncture headache, shivering, itching, epidural abscess, meningitis, haematoma, nerve injury, spinal cord ischaemia, cardiovascular collapse, wrong route injection) and requires significant patient cooperation and specialist skills for its placement.

The recently published third national audit on complications of central neuraxial blocks 36 has reported that central neuraxial block has a low rate of complications and amongst all groups the risks are lowest with obstetric, paediatric and chronic pain patients. However the complications, if they occur can have severe morbidity and mortality. There is also evidence that combined spinal epidural (CSE) has a disproportionately higher risk of serious complications than an epidural 36 and thus it would seem reasonable to use this technique only where there are specific indications rather than as a routine substitute for epidural analgesia. There continues to be an alarmingly high proportion of wrong route injection errors in obstetric practice 36 despite the presence of multiprofessional best practice guidance 37 and NPSA published safety alert 38.

In a recent survey of 206 obstetric units only one in four respondents reported knowledge of a wrong route error involving epidural infusions in their maternity units 39 which is alarming. It would be thus rational to adopt simple precautions like isolating epidural bags from IV fluid bags, colour coding of epidural pumps/ lines and solutions, prominently marking epidural infusions/ filters and appropriate training. A universally available unique set of epidural syringes, bags and giving set with complete incompatibility to routine IV giving sets is an attractive proposition but has obvious cost implications. Epidural analgesia is given via a variety of techniques including simple bolus dose administration by midwife, continues infusion via a pump, patient controlled epidural analgesia with or without background infusion or computer integrated patient controlled epidural analgesia (CIPCEA). A meta analysis of PCEA vs CEI which analysed 9 studies (640 patients) concluded that PCEA use was associated with lower dose requirements of local anaesthetic and are less likely to cause motor block 41. When PCEA technique is used there is evidence that there is a trend towards decreased rescue analgesia when larger bolus dose with longer lockout interval is used 41.

Labour analgesia has indeed evolved from use of chloroform and ether but still incorporates certain techniques used well over a century ago (although with fine modifications) like use of nitrous oxide and antenatal preparation for labour. It can be concluded that a multimodal approach taking into account locally up to date protocols and available resources with careful attention to maternal and foetal monitoring and appropriate training of staff should be implemented. Further, continuous audit of currently used techniques and research into novel strategies is bound to improve patient satisfaction.

References

  1. RJ Stevens, F Heide. Analgesic characteristics of prepared childbirth techniques: Attention focusing and systematic relaxation. Journal of psychosomatic research 1977; 21(6): 429-438
  2. Lamaze F: Painless Childbirth: The Lamaze Method. Chicago, Henry Regnery Company, 1955.
  3. Augustinsson LE, Boilin P, Bundsen P, et al. Pain relief during delivery by transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation. Pain 1977; 4: 59-65.
  4. Melzack R, Wall PD. Pain mechanisms: a new theory. Science 1965; 150: 971-9.
  5. Lechner W, Jarosch E, Solder E, Waitz-Penz A, Mitterschiffthaler G. Beta-endorphins during childbirth under transcutaneous electric nerve stimulation [Verhalten von Beta-Endorphin wahrend der Geburt unter transkutaner elektrischer Nervenstimulation]. Zentralblatt fur Gynakologie 1991; 113(8): 439-42.
  6. Findley I, Chamberlain G. ABC of labour care. Relief of pain. BMJ 1999; 318(7188): 927-30.
  7. Gentz BA. Alternative therapies for the management of pain in labor and delivery. Clinical Obstetrics & Gynecology 2001; 44(4): 704-32
  8. Simkin P, Bolding A. Update on nonpharmacologic approaches to relieve labor pain and prevent suffering. Journal of Midwifery & Womens's Health 2004; 49(6): 489-504
  9. Lowe NK. The nature of labor pain. Am J Obstet and Gynecol 2002; 186(5): 16-24
  10. Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) for pain relief in labour. Dowswell T, Bedwell C, Lavender T, Neilson JP. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2009, Issue 2. Art. No.: CD007214. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD007214.
  11. Lawrence C. Tsen, John Thomas, Scott Segal, Sanjay Datta, Angela M. Bader. Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation does not augment combined spinal epidural labour analgesia. Can J Anesth 2000; 47(1): 38-42
  12. Fang F, Guo TZ, Davies MF, Maze M. Opiate receptors in the periaqueductal gray mediate analgesic effect of nitrous oxide in rats. Euro J of pharmacol 1997; 336(2-3): 137-41
  13. Ranft A, Kurz J, Becker K, Dodt HU, Zieglgänsberger W, Rammes G, Kochs E, Eder M, Nitrous oxide (N2O) pre- and postsynaptically attenuates NMDA receptor-mediated neurotransmission in the amygdala: Neuropharmacology 2007; 52(3): 716-723
  14. Mark A Rosen, Nitrous Oxide for relief of labor pain: A systematic review: Am J Obstet and Gynecol 2002; 186: 110-126
  15. MRC. Committee, Report to the Medical Research Council of the Committee on Nitrous Oxide and Oxygen Analgesia in Midwifery. Clinical trials of different concentrations of oxygen and nitrous oxide for obstetric analgesia, Br Med J 1970; 1: 709–713
  16. C Amiel-Tison, G Barrier and S Shnider et al., A new neurologic and adaptive capacity scoring system for evaluating obstetric medications in full-term newborns, Anesthesiology 1982; 56: 340–350
  17. P Ranta, P Jouppila and M Spalding et al., Parturients’ assessment of water blocks, pethidine, nitrous oxide, paracervical and epidural blocks in labour, Int J Obstet Anesth 1994; 4: 193–198
  18. B Waud and D. Waud, Calculated kinetics of distribution of nitrous oxide and methoxyflurane during intermittent administration in obstetrics, Anesthesiology 1970; 32: 306–316
  19. Agneta Ramnero, Ulf Hanson and Mona Kihlgren, Acupuncture treatment during labour a randomised control trial, BJOG 2002; 6: 637-644
  20. Hyangsook Lee K, Edzard Ernst. Acupuncture for labor pain management: A systematic review. Am J Obstet and Gynecol 2005; 191(4): 1573-1579
  21. S Arora, M Tustall, J Ross. Self administered mixture of entonox and isoflurane in labour. IJOA 1992; 1(4): 199-202
  22. ST Yeo, A Holdcroft, SM Yentis, A Stewart, P Bassett. Analgesia with sevoflurane during labour: II. Sevoflurane compared with entonox for labour analgesia. BJA 2007; 98: 110-115
  23. Abboud TK, Swart F, Zhu J, Donavan MM, Pares DaSilva E, Yakal K. Desflurane analgesia for vaginal delivery. Acta Anaesthesia Scandinavica 1995; 39: 259-61
  24. JP Tuckey, RE Prout, MYK Wee. Prescribing intramuscular opioids for labour analgesia in consultant-led maternity units: a survey of UK practice. Int J Obstet Anesth 2008; 17(1): 3-8
  25. Claudio G. Sosa, Pierre Buekens, Janet M. Hughes, Erica Balaguer, Gonzalo Sotero, Ruben Panizza, Hector Piriz, Justo G. Alonso. Effect of pethidine administered during the first stage of labor on the acid–base status at birth. European J Obst and Gyne and Reproductive Biology 2006; 129(2): 135-139
  26. Bricker L, Lavender T. Parentral opiods for labour pain relief: a systematic review. Am J Obstet and Gynecol 2002; 186: 94-109
  27. Olofsson CH, Ekblom A, Ekman-Ordeberg G, Hjelm A, Irestedt L. Lack of analgesic effect of systemically administered morphine or pethidine on labour pain. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1996; 103: 968 –972
  28. Reynolds F, Crowhurst JA. Opioids in labour-no analgesic effect. Lancet 1997; 349: 4-5
  29. Michelle H.Y. Tsui, Warwick D. Ngan Kee, Floria F. Ng, Tze K. Lau A double blinded randomised placebo-controlled study of intramuscular pethidine for pain relief in the first stage of labour BJOG 2004; 3: 648–655
  30. Nikkola EM, Ekblad UU, Kero PO, et al. Intravenous fentanyl PCA during labour. Can J Anesth 1997; 44: 1248–55
  31. Morley-Forster PK, Reid DW, Vandeberghe H. A comparison of patient-controlled analgesia fentanyl and alfentanil for labour analgesia. Can J Anesth 2000; 47: 113–9.
  32. Olufolabi AJ, Booth JV, Wakeling HG, et al. A preliminary investigation of remifentanil as a labor analgesic. Anesth Analg 2000; 91: 606–8.
  33. Owen MD, Poss MJ, Dean LS, Harper MA. Prolonged intravenous remifentanil infusion for labor analgesia. Anesth Analg 2002; 94: 918–9.
  34. Volmanen P, Akural EI, Raudaskoski T, Alahuhta S. Remifentanil in obstetric analgesia: a dose-finding study. Anesth Analg 2002; 94: 913–7.
  35. R, Pegrum A, Stacey RG. Patient-controlled analgesia using remifentanil in the parturient with thrombocytopaenia. Anaesthesia 1999; 54: 461-5
  36. T. M. Cook, D. Counsell, J. A. W. Wildsmith on behalf of The Royal College of Anaesthetists Third National Audit Project. BJA 2009; 102(2): 179-190
  37. Good Practice in the Management of Continuous Epidural Analgesia in the Hospital Setting. (2004) Royal College of Anaesthetists.
  38. http://www.npsa.nhs.uk/nrls/alerts-and-directives/alerts/epidural- injections-and-infusions/
  39. R. Jones, H. A. Swales, G. R. Lyons. A national survey of safe practice with epidural analgesia in obstetric units. Anaesthesia 2008; 63: 516–519
  40. S.M Siddik-Sayyid, M.T. Aouad, M.I Jalbout, AS Baraka et al. Comparison of three modes of patient-controlled epidural analgesia during labour. Euro J Anaesth 2005; 22: 30-34.
  41. M. van der Vyver, S Halpern, G Joseph. Patient-controlled epidural analgesia versus continuous infusion for labour analgesia: a meta- analysis. BJA 2002; 89(3): 459-65.

top

If you are interested in responding to one of the articles featured in
Anaesthesia Product News please email us at editor@apnews.co.uk